Journal peer review in context:
Martin Blank on Electromagnetic Fields. An analysis of the scientific studies found that the majority of industry-funded studies found no effects, whereas the majority of independent studies did find effects.
This is the same thing that had happened for the tobacco and lung cancer studies. It is important, therefore, not only to consider the conclusions of a study, but also its sources of funding.
The media typically presents an undecided viewpoint, one moment raising concerns, and the next moment saying that those concerns are unfounded. Stories are sometimes altered to soften the blow to the wireless industry.
When Fortune magazine first reported on electromagnetic hypersensitivity inMotorola stopped advertising with Fortune magazine for a long time, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars of lost income, according to Microwave News.
The media can also have a conflict of interest.
Similarly, the government suffers from a conflict of interest. Billions of dollars are paid for the allocation of the wireless spectrum.
Even health organizations like the World Health Organization suffer from conflicts of interest, and industry sometimes works to reverse judgments on the danger of electromagnetic fields. Conflicts of interest can prevent health advisory bodies from sounding the alarm on health hazards.
Scientists Challenged There are many scientists who have had their funding or positions threatened because they found or spoke out on harmful effects from wireless radiation. Although their credibility has been challenged, their findings have in many cases been reproduced by other scientists.
For example, Henry Lai, who found DNA effects in response to microwaves, was challenged and threatened. There is another interesting story shared by Devra Davis that the Adlkofer study was called a fraud in Science magazine, but that this story of fraud was later ruled to be a fraud itself.
There are now approximately 11 studies now pointing towards DNA breaks. Similarly, Allan Frey discovered blood-brain barrier leakage as a result of microwave radiation, which was challenged. However, Leif Salford expanded upon the work, and also showed that rodents' brain cells were dying as a result of microwave radiation.
There is no consistent evidence that wireless radiation is harmful. The weight of the evidence points towards no harm. While the majority of industry-funded studies do not find health effects, the majority of independent studies do. The same thing had happened for the Tobacco industry.
Anyone studying the research must be careful to "follow the money trail. Many of the adverse biological effects of wireless technologies have been confirmed by more than one scientific group, including DNA breaks, the increase of free radicals, and the opening of the blood brain barrier. Oftentimes, such findings are followed with an attempt to discredit the scientists involved.
However, other scientists later confirm the findings. When we talk about the "weight of the evidence", we cannot just compare the number of studies finding an effect versus the number of studies not finding an effect. It's very easy in principle to design a study so that it does not find an effect, e.
Being classified as a Group 2B possible carcinogen is no reason for concern, because coffee is also a Group 2B carcinogen. Meanwhile, there are scientists who now believe EMF's should be considered a Group 2A probable carcinogen.Researchers Database The Researchers Database contains information on virtually all researchers and research at Osaka University, including even the President.
Clear explanation of Conflict of Interest with examples in journal articles. All papers I've read so far has the Conflict of interest: My research reflects.
What is a conflict of interest? We often find ourselves faced with two or more competing interests, creating the perception, if not the reality, of an increased risk of bias or poor judgment. We are most familiar with financial conflicts.
The CFPC requires all presenters and members of Planning Committees to complete the CFPC Mainpro+® Declaration of Conflict of Interest form as part of the Mainpro+ certification process. What is a conflict of interest? We often find ourselves faced with two or more competing interests, creating the perception, if not the reality, of an increased risk of bias or poor judgment.
This sample Conflict of Interest Research Paper is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need help writing your assignment READ MORE HERE.